Sunday, April 20, 2025

Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., on the terms for "seer" (ראה) and "visionary" (חזה) in the Old Testament

  

More light can be shed on the nature of the prophetic gifts by examining some of the key Hebrew terms for “prophet.” Though most of these titles were adopted by both the false and the true prophets alike, they still give us an insight into some of the tasks and ministries that the true prophets performed.

 

One of the earliest terms was rō’eh (“seer”). With regard to specific individuals we know of its usage only in connection with Samuel (1 Sam. 9:9) and Hanai (2 Chron. 16:7). The only place it occurs in the prophetic books is Isaiah 30:10. The term seems to stress God’s gift of seeing what is lost (as in the case of Samuel with the donkeys of Saul’s father) or what is to come in the future.

 

Closely aligned to this term is the second designation for a prophet, ḥōzeh (“visionary”). Here the focus is not on the natural eye that was given a view of the distant future or of what was lost, but on the mental or inward eye. The term appears as early as Exodus 24:11, where we are told that the seventy elders “saw” God. Balaam, the prophet from upper Mesopotamia, claimed to “see” a vision from the Almighty (Num. 24:4); but the first technical use of ḥōzeh is found in 2 Samuel 24:11 in connection with Gad, David’s visionary. Interestingly enough, 2 Chronicles 16:7 describes the prophet Hanani as a rō’eh, but 2 Chronicles 19:2 refers to Hanani’s son as a ḥōzeh. The priest of Bethel also used the term ḥōzeh to describe Amos in their bitter encounter in Amos 7:12. (Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., Back Toward the Future: Hints for Interpreting Biblical Prophecy [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 1989], 72-73)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Saturday, April 19, 2025

Scriptural Mormonism Podcast Episode 74: Interview with Bradley Crum and Brady Crum (Former Baptist Ministers)

 

Episode 74: Interview with Bradley Crum and Brady Crum (Former Baptist Ministers)




 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

 




Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., on Micah 3:12

  

The prophet Micah’s proclamation that “because of you [sinners], Zion will be plowed like a field, Jerusalem will become a heap of rubble, the temple hill mound overgrown with thickets” (Mic. 3:12) produced a definite effect on the people who heard him in the mid-700s B.C. We know this from a reference in Jeremiah a century later (Jer. 26:17-19). Micah’s preaching had produced the effect of repentance and the fear of the Lord. And since the people of that day repented and sought the Lord, the Lord, in turn, repented of the evil that he had threatened to bring on the people. The prophecy had had its effect in the areas of confession of sin, avoidance of evil, and obedience seen in good works. (Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., Back Toward the Future: Hints for Interpreting Biblical Prophecy [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 1989], 27)

 

 

Another instance of a prophecy whose fulfilment was delayed can be found in Micah 3:12. Micah’s word in the eighth century had an effect on King Hezekiah and many of his day. So remarkable was the response that Jeremiah made a favorable allusion to it a century later in Jeremiah 26:18-19, “Did not Hezekiah fear the LORD and seek his favor [when Micah said, ‘Zion will be plowed like a field, Jerusalem will become a heap of rubble, the temple hill a mound, overgrown with thickets’]? And did not the LORD relent, so that he did not bring the disaster he pronounced against them?” Thus the king’s repentance obviated for the time being the fulfilment of what was a conditional prophecy from Micah. Since the repentance was not widespread, the effect was only to delay the fulfilment, for the disaster predicted eventually came in 587, when Jerusalem fell. (Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., Back Toward the Future: Hints for Interpreting Biblical Prophecy [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 1989], 67-68)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Friday, April 18, 2025

Irenaeus of Lyons: Jesus Sweated Literal Blood in Luke 22:43-44

 The following comes from Against Heresies 3.22.2:

 

On the other hand, His [supposed] “descent into Mary” would be useless. For why would He descend into her if He were to receive nothing from her? And, if He received nothing from Mary, He would never have taken of the foods got from the earth, by which the body that was taken from the earth is nourished; nor would His body have hungered and sought its food after the fast of forty days, in imitation of Moses and Elias. Neither would His disciple John, when writing of Him, have said, So Jesus, wearied as He was with the journey, sat down. Nor would David have exclaimed of Him in prophecy, And they had added to the grief of my wounds. nor would Jesus have wept over Lazarus; nor would He have sweat drops of blood; nor would He have said, My soul is very sorrowful. nor would blood and water have flowed from His side when it was pierced. For all these things are indications of the flesh that was taken from the earth, which He recapitulated in Himself, thus saving His handiwork. (St. Irenaeus of Lyons: Against the Heresies, Book 3 [trans. Dominic J. Unger; Ancient Christian Writers 64; New York: the Newman Press, 2012], 103-4)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Thursday, April 17, 2025

William Lane Craig on 2 Timothy 3:16

In response to Luke Timothy Johnson’s claim that “Paul and his contemporaries did not confine “inspiration” to those literary compositions that are now found in the Bible”:

 

A doctrine of Scripture has no interest in making a unique, much less exclusive, claim to divine revelation, since the biblical God reveals himself in manifold ways, as we have seen. The objection also trades on the ambiguity of the term “inspiration,” for of course prophets and seers of all sorts could be said to be “inspired.” But that sort of personal inspiration is very different from a God-breathed Scripture, which is unique to the biblical books. To carry his objection Johnson needs to show the author of II Timothy himself accepted other literary compositions of God-breathed, which is unprovable. (William Lane Craig, Systematic Philosophical Theology [Croydon: Wiley Blackwell, 2025], 1:93 n. 34)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Victor P. Hamilton on Genesis 46:34

  

The thrust of Joseph’s last statement is not clear: an abomination to Egyptians is every shepherd. Might not such an acknowledgment by Jacob and his children that they are shepherds or cattle-breeders result in their exclusion from Egypt, if in fact such people are an abomination in Egypt? There is slim, if any, indication in Egyptian literature that Egyptians held shepherds in contempt, unless one sees here a popular understanding (Manetho, Josephus) of the term hyksos (invaders from Asia in the 17th century b.c. who ruled over Egypt for approximately a century, with their capital at Avaris in the Delta), later held in contempt by Egyptians as “shepherd kings.” If Joseph is associated with a group of people, a family, that engages in a despised occupation, what does that do to his own reputation and his ability to expedite his responsibilities? Perhaps it is best to understand Joseph’s remark as applying only to non-Egyptian shepherds, that is, reflecting Egyptian xenophobia. Perhaps this statement by Joseph reflects the tension that existed in Egypt as well between the urbanites and those living in the open country. It also reflects the earlier tension between Abel, who was a shepherd (rōʿēh ṣōʾn, 4:2, the same expression as at the end of v. 34), and Cain, who was a farmer. Cain and the Egyptians are workers of the land. Abel and Joseph’s family are shepherds of the flocks. What in Gen. 4 was a fraternal division is in Gen. 46 an international division.

 

In Exod. 8:22 (Eng. 26) Moses stated that offering sacrifices in Egypt would be an abomination in the eyes of the Egyptians. Both Exod. 8:22 (Eng. 26) and Gen. 46:34 use the word tôʿēḇá (see also its use in 43:32) to point out what Egyptians considered abhorrent, i.e., pastoral pursuits. Precisely why the Egyptians would so view the sacrifices from the flocks of the Hebrews is not stated. In any case, Joseph is encouraging his family to be absolutely honest with Pharaoh regarding their occupation. They are not to try and be something they are not. Dishonesty is an issue that long plagued Jacob and his family. It is Judah who shows his family the way to Goshen. But it falls to his brother Joseph to make it possible for his family to settle in Goshen. (Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis, Chapters 18–50 [The New International Commentary on the Old Testament; Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1995), 603–604.

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

The Time of the Crucifixion of Jesus

I was queried this morning concerning the hour of the crucifixion and death of Jesus. I decided to use the advanced search option I have on Logos (I have a full subscription). This is the answer:

 

The timing of Jesus' crucifixion is a subject of debate due to apparent discrepancies between Gospel accounts. Mark's Gospel states that Jesus was crucified at the "third hour" (around 9:00 AM)[1][2][3], while John's Gospel suggests the trial before Pilate was not over until the "sixth hour" (around noon)[3][4][5]. Various explanations have been proposed for this difference, including the possibility of different time-keeping systems or scribal errors in copying the texts[2][3]. The phrase "sixth hour" in John's account may not necessarily refer to the time of crucifixion, but rather to the time when Pilate presented Jesus, saying "Look, your king!"[4][5]. Despite these discrepancies, the Gospels agree that darkness fell over the land from the sixth to the ninth hour (noon to 3:00 PM)[2][4]. It's important to note that the exact chronology remains a subject of scholarly debate, and the articles do not provide a definitive resolution to this issue.

 

[1] Rodney L. Cooper, Mark, vol. 2, Holman New Testament Commentary (Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2000), 259.
[2] Mark L. Strauss, Mark, ed. Clinton E. Arnold, Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2014), 691–692.
[3] Walter W. Wessel, “Mark,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Matthew, Mark, Luke, ed. Frank E. Gaebelein, vol. 8 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1984), 780.
[4] J. Ramsey Michaels, The Gospel of John, The New International Commentary on the Old and New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, UK: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2010), 942.
[5] Marianne Meye Thompson, John: A Commentary, First edition, The New Testament Library (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2015), 388.

 

 

Here are the excerpts from the above-referenced works (in some cases, I have included a bit more information than referenced above for larger context):

 

[1] Rodney L. Cooper, Mark, vol. 2, Holman New Testament Commentary (Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2000), 259

 

15:25. Mark says that Jesus was crucified the third hour or about 9:00 a.m. This differs from John’s account (19:14), which says that Christ was crucified about the sixth hour or 12:00 noon. The difference between the two accounts can be attributed to different ways of calculating time. John was probably using the Roman time system that counted the hours from midnight to midnight. The sixth hour would then be 6:00 a.m. Mark was probably following the Jewish custom of counting hours from daybreak or 6:00 a.m. The third hour would then be 9:00 a.m., according to Mark.

 

Looking at the text closely, it appears that Jesus’ trial concluded about 6:00 a.m. (John) and that Jesus was crucified at 9:00 a.m. (Mark). During the intervening time, Jesus was taken from the court of Pilate, mocked by the Roman soldiers, led to Golgotha, and prepared for crucifixion (Lane, Mark, p. 567).

 

[2] Mark L. Strauss, Mark, ed. Clinton E. Arnold, Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2014), 691–692

 

15:25 It was the third hour when they crucified him (ἦν δὲ ὥρα τρίτη καὶ ἐσταύρωσαν αὐτόν). The third hour is 9:00 a.m. Though elsewhere Mark rarely gives precise chronological references, he carefully charts the time of the crucifixion. Jesus is crucified in the third hour; the darkness comes on the land until the sixth hour (noon; 15:33); Jesus cries out and dies at the ninth hour (3:00 p.m.; 15:34). Joseph of Arimathea then approaches Pilate about the body “when evening approached” (ὀψίας γενομένης; v. 42; approx. 6:00 p.m.?).

 

Mark’s chronology makes good sense with reference to an early morning Roman trial, but appears to contradict the Fourth Gospel, where Jesus’ Roman trial concludes around the sixth hour (noon; John 19:14), and Jesus is crucified sometime after this (19:18). Various harmonizations have been suggested. (1) Some have claimed John is counting time from midnight, as in our modern system, so that the sixth hour is 6:00 a.m. This is unlikely, however, since there is no Latin or Greek attestation of this reckoning of hours.

 

[3] Walter W. Wessel, “Mark,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Matthew, Mark, Luke, ed. Frank E. Gaebelein, vol. 8 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1984), 780

 

25 Mark says that Jesus was crucified the third hour, i.e., 9:00 A.M. This conflicts with John’s account, which says that the trial before Pilate was not quite over by the sixth hour, i.e., 12:00 noon, therefore implying that the Crucifixion took place later still. Several solutions to this difficult problem have been suggested.

 

1. John was using Roman time. Thus the sixth hour was 6:00 A.M., not 12:00 noon; and the three-hour interval was taken up with the scourging, mocking, and preparations for the Crucifixion.

 

2. An early copyist has confused a Greek Γ—the letter that stands for three—with a ϝ [digamma]—the letter that stands for six.

 

3. Verse 25 is a gloss; i.e., it was added by an early copyist. Of these the first seems to be a desperate attempt at harmonization since there is no evidence whatever for it; the third is a possibility since both Matthew and Luke do not include this verse, and they ordinarily follow Mark’s indications of time in the passion narrative; the second seems most likely since such a copyist error could very easily have occurred.

 

[4] J. Ramsey Michaels, The Gospel of John, The New International Commentary on the Old and New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, UK: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2010), 941-43

 

To the same end the Gospel writer adds a narrative aside, “Now it was the preparation of the Passover; it was about the sixth hour,” and, resuming the narrative, goes on to tell us that Pilate then “says to the Jews, ‘Look, your king!’ ”133 (v. 14). The two designations of time (“preparation of the Passover,” and “the sixth hour”), closely linked to the presentation of Jesus as king, seem to carry more weight than the two designations of place (“Stone Pavement” and “Gabbatha”). The “preparation” normally meant Friday, the day before Sabbath (see Mk 15:42), but in connection with “the Passover” it refers to the day before Passover, when lambs were slaughtered in “preparation” for the Passover meal. Although the Gospel writer does not labor the point, Jesus, “the Lamb of God” (1:29), will die on that very day. That it was indeed the “preparation” in that sense was clear from the moment Jesus was brought to Pilate, when those who brought him “did not go into the praetorium, so that they might not be defiled but might eat the Passover” (18:28). Later, however, we will learn that it was the “preparation” in both senses, for it seems to have been a year in which the Passover also fell on a Sabbath (see below, vv. 31, 42).

 

As for the notice that “it was about the sixth hour,” any reader familiar with other Gospels will notice a conflict with the tradition that “It was the third hour when they crucified him” (Mk 15:25). It is commonly agreed that in the Gospels (as in the Mediterranean world generally) daytime was reckoned from 6:00 a.m. on, so that “the third hour” would be 9:00 a.m. and “the sixth hour” noon. A surprising number of commentators have theorized that “the sixth hour” is a Johannine invention designed to make the point that Jesus was crucified at the precise time the Passover lambs were being slaughtered in the temple. But the evidence for this is late and obscure (according to Exod 12:6, the lambs were to be slaughtered “at twilight”), and one would expect the Gospel writer to call attention to such a remarkable correspondence. It is better to content ourself with the recognition that while the text “does link Jesus’ death with the slaughter of the Passover lambs in the temple,” the link is “of the day rather than the hour.” This means that “the sixth hour” as the approximate time of the presentation and crucifixion of Jesus is not merely a theological construction, but is to be taken seriously as a tradition independent of Mark. It should also be noted that all three synoptic Gospels testify to “the sixth hour” as the time when darkness began to “cover the whole earth” (Mt 27:45//Mk 15:33//Lk 23:44).

 

In the interest of harmonization, some have proposed that in this instance, the new day began at midnight (as in Roman law), so that “the sixth hour” would be 6:00 a.m., but besides being inconsistent with other time references in the Gospel of John (1:39; 4:6, 52), this expedient creates more problems than it solves. Too much has happened since “early morning” (18:28) for “the sixth hour” to be only 6:00 a.m. Moreover, if we are to have the crucifixion at 9:00 a.m. (as in Mark), the three hours that must still elapse between verse 14 and verse 17 (when Jesus is crucified) are left unaccounted for. And why would the Gospel writer fix the time of Jesus’ presentation as king so precisely and the time of his crucifixion not at all? It appears rather that the Gospel writer wants to call attention to two decisive events, close together in time—the presentation as king (vv. 13–14), and the crucifixion (vv. 17–18)—each linked to a specific place identified with both a Greek and a Semitic name (vv. 13, 17), with an approximate time designation in between, sufficient to locate both (“it was about the sixth hour”). If—as is generally agreed—the crucifixion is Jesus’ “lifting up” (as in 3:14; 8:28; 12:32), it is just as plausible to think of the presentation, “Look, your king!” as his “glorification” (as in 7:39; 11:4; 12:16, 23, 28; 13:31–32; 17:1, 5), for the one is no less ironic than the other. As far as the Gospel writer is concerned, whatever the shame of crucifixion, Jesus was in fact “lifted up” to the Father, and whatever Pilate’s motivation, “glorified” here as “Son of God” and “King” (see vv. 7, 12).

 

[5] Marianne Meye Thompson, John: A Commentary, First edition, The New Testament Library (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2015), 388-90

 

[Re. John 19:13-14]

 

John’s next note, “It was the day of Preparation for the Passover, and it was the sixth hour,” presents the timing of Jesus’ trial, crucifixion, and death differently from the Synoptic accounts. According to Mark, Jesus is crucified at nine o’clock in the morning (15:25), on the morning after eating the Passover meal with his disciples (cf. 14:12, 14, 16), and dies about three o’clock in the afternoon. Thus in Mark, Jesus’ arrest, trial, and crucifixion happen after this meal is eaten. According to John, Jesus’ last meal with his disciples takes place “before Passover” (13:1; 18:28). Thus Pilate passes sentence on Jesus at about noon “on the day of preparation for Passover” (19:14). Jesus is crucified; he dies and is buried before sundown and the Passover meal.

 

There are various explanations of these chronological differences. One of the most common takes John’s chronology to reflect his determination to present Jesus as sentenced to death at noon (“the sixth hour”) in order to align the timing of his death with the slaughter of the Passover lambs, understood to have begun at noon. In other words, Jesus dies during the exact hour when the Passover lambs are slaughtered. But this interpretation requires the coherence of three questionable points: (1) the lambs for Passover actually begin to be slaughtered at noon; (2) this fact is widely known to or appreciated by John’s readers; (3) John’s Gospel actually intends the comparison. While the issues are complicated, the evidence counts against this interpretation of John’s reference to the sixth hour, and John does not sufficiently explain his cryptic reference to “the sixth hour” so as to render that interpretation plausible.

 

1. No ancient Palestinian source actually states that the lambs for Passover began to be slaughtered at noon. In Jubilees (2d c. b.c.e.), the Israelites are instructed to “sacrifice [the Passover] before it becomes evening” (49.1, 12); and “at evening when the sun is setting on the third part of the day” (49:19; cf. 11Q19 XVII, 7). Josephus, a priest, places the sacrifice “from the ninth hour until the eleventh” or what we might call mid to late afternoon. According to the Mishnah, the Passover lambs were sacrificed after the daily burnt offering. The earliest permissible time for such offerings occurs when the eve of Passover coincides with the eve of Sabbath; then the daily burnt offering is slaughtered at “half after the sixth hour” and offered at “half after the seventh hour” (1:30). The Passover offering was slaughtered after that: sometime after 1:30 in the afternoon (see m. Pesaḥ. 1:4; 4:1, 5). Philo does speak of the offering of myriads of lambs from noon (mesēmbria) till eventide (hespera, in Spec. 2.145), but the comment notes the duration, rather than the beginning, of the appropriate time for sacrifice. In other words, no ancient source unequivocally locates this sacrifice of Passover lambs at noon.

 

2. The exact hour of this sacrifice was unlikely to have been known (or have mattered) to the readers of John’s Gospel. Of course, that depends to some extent on how we envision the audience of John’s Gospel. If Christians from the Roman Empire surrounding the Mediterranean were in view, it can be doubted whether the vast majority of them knew or cared about details such as the exact hour at which the Passover lambs were sacrificed. For that matter, it is doubtful that even pilgrims who went up to Jerusalem for the feast knew the details of fixing the precise hour of this sacrifice. For what readers would John’s allusion have been instructive?

 

3. One could argue that while John’s readers would not have made the connection, John nevertheless intends to indicate the solemnity of the hour and the significance of Jesus’ death as the Passover lamb by noting that it was the hour when the slaughter began that Jesus was sent to his death. But John does not signal to his reader that “the sixth hour” is either unusually significant, or if it is, what its significance might be. John includes three other references to precise hours (1:39; 4:6, 52; see comments on 4:52–53). Jesus’ “hour” has been anticipated throughout the Gospel; with the unfolding events of Jesus’ passion, that hour clearly has come (12:23, 27; 13:1; 17:1). Pilate’s sentencing of Jesus at “the sixth hour” adds to the momentous movement toward his death.

 

There is no mistaking the importance of the moment. Pilate has not yet sentenced Jesus to death. He offers the Jews one more opportunity to acknowledge their King. Presenting Jesus, flogged and dressed in purple robes and a crown of thorns, Pilate acclaims, “See your King!” This statement joins with Pilate’s earlier pronouncement, “See the man!” The two announcements go together: this man is their King.

  

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

 

 

 

Blog Archive